#43 – AS DODD-FRANK CONFLICT MINERALS REPORTING DEADLINE NEARS NO ESCAPE FOR RETAILERS AND BRANDS – KELLY EISENHARDT

Kelly EisenhardtFair Factories Clearinghouse’s executive director of environmental programs Kelly Eisenhardt talks with Nate Herman, responsible for International Trade at the American Apparel and Footwear Association (AAFA), about how he sees the Conflict Minerals reporting deadline of May 2014 affecting the retail industry. With the undefined requirements for use of contract manufacturers, the potential of processing materials to leak during manufacturing, and the need for both brands and retailers to report to the SEC, they talk about how he foresees helping AAFA members get this right. Continue reading

#42 – RISK: A PRODUCT – UMBERTO TUNESI

Umberto Tunesi pixRisk, a Product: what a bewildering idea!

Actually, it’s not quite a bewildering idea.

RISK = PRODUCT
When we look at some official definitions of risk, such as “the possibility of incurring misfortune or loss” and “to act in spite of the possibility of injury or loss”, and we compare them with the ISO 9000 definition of ‘product’, that is “result of a process” (3.4.2), any enterprise, that is a process, may incur in misfortune, injury or loss.

Therefore, the equation holds true: risk = product. Continue reading

#42 – ISO 9001:2015 AUDITABILITY – GREG HUTCHINS

Greg Hutchins pixI’m working on ISO 9001:2015 FAQ Book, which is part of our Future of Quality: Risk® series of books.

Our conclusion is that the new ISO revision is going to be a shocker to many companies, consultants, and certification bodies.  So, let’s look at some of the critical questions perplexing the larger certification bodies about the ISO 9001:2015 auditability. Continue reading

#42 – GEO-POLITICAL INSTABILITY & CONSEQUENCES TO THE SUPPLY CHAIN – STUART ROSENBERG

Stuart Rosenber pixIt is a known fact that we are in a new ‘world economy’, not through governments but on the level of common businesses.  Many small and mid-size companies need a how-to course on interacting with larger businesses.  Of course doing business in such a diverse environment is a trial unto itself as we’ve seen with a major US economic collapse and a 100% rise in oil prices.  Continue reading

#42 – ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF EFFECTIVE CAPA SYSTEMS – KEN PETERSON

The end result objective of a corrective and preventative action (CAPA) is, quite simply, a solution to the issue from which the CAPA was generated. If it is not driving toward a solution, a CAPA is a waste of time and resources. For organizations in regulatory environments, CAPA is an overarching umbrella—all control points flow through to the CAPA system.

From the perspective of regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), CAPA is viewed as the central component that affects all control points including design controls, production and process controls, records and documents change controls, material controls, and facility and equipment controls. Since more than half of Form 483 observations and warning letters cite CAPA deficiencies, it is evident that FDA investigators are likely to look first at a company’s CAPA system during their inspections. In recent years the FDA has been promoting the adoption of closed loop CAPA systems where CAPA is the tool that drives reports and keeps management informed. Continue reading