Author Archives: greg

#23 – RISK IN THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY – FRANK PHILLIPS

Posted on by
Reply

Having worked in the insurance industry for many years and many major carriers as an underwriter  – I have heard the word risk about as many times as one can imagine.  But no matter what the coverage in the property and casualty world there is a common risk evaluation process that can be applied. This process can certainly be incorporated into more broad enterprise risk management functions in corporations. In taking the Chartered Property and Casualty Underwriter (CPCU designation) tests there was invariably a question related to implementing the risk evaluation process. Continue reading →

#23 – MAGIC WORDS AND ENCHANTED BEANS – MARK MOORE

Posted on by
Reply

Mark MooreSeveral discussions on LinkedIn recently have prompted me to think once again about how we place our projects and organizations at risk – sometimes severe risk – by relying on what amounts to “magic words and enchanted beans”.  And by that, I mean the tendency to either talk about buzzword tactics or strategies or throw tools at problems and believe we have actually implemented them.  Not only does this ignore the hard work of applying something we’ve never done before, it ends up as a fool’s errand and could cost us dearly in the end.  Give you some examples you say?  Certainly!  I’m glad you asked … Continue reading →

#23 – CAN PROJECTS INCORPORATE TOO LITTLE RISK PART II – HOWARD WIENER

Posted on by
Reply

Howard Wiener PixIn the previous post, I discussed an approach to valuing projects using Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) analysis.  In this post, I will use the DCF technique combined with a fixed scenario to demonstrate a difference in Net Present Value (NPV) resulting from implementing a series of projects on an existing platform vs. replacing the aging platform and fulfilling the same requirements with up-to-date tools.  The horizon of the analysis is 20 years.

But first, read our last article on incorporating too little risk. Continue reading →

#23 – UNDERSTANDING THE TOP DRIVERS FOR REDUCING QUALITY RISK – LNS RESERACH

Posted on by
Reply

When it comes to building compliance into production processes, we’ve spoken to numerous companies in the past several years that have done an admirable job. However, there are still many – particularly in the manufacturing sector today – that struggle to meet product and process specifications set out of by regulatory bodies, customers, and even internal management. These companies are more vulnerable to quality risk than others. Continue reading →

#23 – RISK MANAGEMENT IN THE 2015 REVISION OF ISO 9001:2008 – SANDFORD LIEBESMAN

Posted on by
Reply

Sandford Liebesman pixISO 9001 (Quality Management) and ISO 14001 (Environmental Management) are scheduled for major revisions by the end of 2015. I recently attended a meeting of the US Technical Advisory Groups for these standards. Although there were many changes proposed, this article will focus on risk management and items left out of the Committee Draft (CD). The CD will form the basis of ISO 9001:2015. I will not discuss ISO 14001 since I am not on the technical committee. Continue reading →