#364 – WHAT IS THE RELIABILITY OF THE RELIABILITY FUNCTION? – FRED SCHENKELBERG

Featured

Jezdimir Knezevic of the MIRCE Akademy published a paper with the title above and I have a few comments.

In the article, Jezdimir suggests that the statistical approach to describing the world about us is fundamental flaws and not inherently useful for our use. He compares a mathematical/statistical approach to a scientific approach and finds the stats wanting.

Let’s take a critical look at the topic of this paper and conclusions. Continue reading

#363 – WHAT SHOULD I LEARN AS A RELIABILITY ENGINEER? – FRED SCHENKELBERG

Featured

Ran across this question the other day from someone just starting in the role of reliability engineer. I wasn’t smart enough to ask this question when I started in the field, yet looking back I’m sure to have found the list of what one should learn and apply daunting.

You should learn how electronics fail. And this may involve:

  • design errors in specific component technologies.
  • assembly errors in specific component processes.
  • material and process variability.
  • environmental stress conditions.
  • use stress conditions.
  • software interactions with hardware.
  • and, the same range of topic at the subsystem and system level, too.

Continue reading

#361 – FIVE WAYS TO KEEP YOUR AUDIENCE’S ATTENTION – FRED SCHENKELBERG

Featured

I have found the best way to lose an audience is to focus on statistical derivation. While this is a fascinating subject for me, it just doesn’t seem to hold an audience’s attention.

Having something interesting and useful to say is key to maintaining an audience’s attention, yet at times how we present helps them become distracted.

So, given great content or proposal, how can you help your audience not quickly check their phone, yet again? Continue reading

#360 – HOW MUCH RELIABILITY DATA IS ENOUGH! – FRED SCHENKELBERG

Featured

Some may argue that just enough reliability data is just the right amount. Too much may lead to confusion, too little doesn’t inform well. The reliability work we do helps others make decisions, and recent work in how humans make decisions may help us prepare and present our results effectively.

If preparing reliability data-based recommendations, consider using less information. Ed O’Brien and Nadav Klein have found decision-makers tend to use much less data or information to make a decision than they think they will need. Continue reading

#359 – THREE WAYS TO IMPROVE YOUR RELIABILITY THINKING – FRED SCHENKELBERG

Featured

I often joke that being a reliability engineer makes it difficult to get on an airplane. Yet air travel is by far the safest method of transportation. Maybe I just think about failure too much.

When a project manager views the day’s tasks, she sees timelines, connections, dependencies. When a marketing manager views a product idea, she sees benefits, sales channels, and profits. When a reliability engineer views a prototype, she sees the many ways it can fail

Continue reading