#369 – CHANGING SUPPORT FOR RELIABILITY ENGINEERING – FRED SCHENKELBERG

Featured

In most organizations being a reliability engineer is a lonely position. I like to think we’re so effective that one or just a small team is all any an organization needs.

As with any engineering position, we have specialized training and skills. We view the world and problems just a little differently than others. Then we use statistics, which tends to future isolate us from our peers. Continue reading

#368 – QUALITY & RELIABILITY: SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES – FRED SCHENKELBERG

Featured

I like to say Reliability is all of quality over time. Quality professional tend to say reliability is an element of quality. David A. Garvin of the Harvard Business School suggests there are eight dimensions to quality, including reliability.

Either way one relates quality and reliability we need to remember that quality or reliability is not a department, team, the engineering down the hall. Quality and reliability is part of the culture of the organization. It is how we make decisions the impact how the product or service performs for customers. Continue reading

#364 – WHAT IS THE RELIABILITY OF THE RELIABILITY FUNCTION? – FRED SCHENKELBERG

Featured

Jezdimir Knezevic of the MIRCE Akademy published a paper with the title above and I have a few comments.

In the article, Jezdimir suggests that the statistical approach to describing the world about us is fundamental flaws and not inherently useful for our use. He compares a mathematical/statistical approach to a scientific approach and finds the stats wanting.

Let’s take a critical look at the topic of this paper and conclusions. Continue reading

#363 – WHAT SHOULD I LEARN AS A RELIABILITY ENGINEER? – FRED SCHENKELBERG

Featured

Ran across this question the other day from someone just starting in the role of reliability engineer. I wasn’t smart enough to ask this question when I started in the field, yet looking back I’m sure to have found the list of what one should learn and apply daunting.

You should learn how electronics fail. And this may involve:

  • design errors in specific component technologies.
  • assembly errors in specific component processes.
  • material and process variability.
  • environmental stress conditions.
  • use stress conditions.
  • software interactions with hardware.
  • and, the same range of topic at the subsystem and system level, too.

Continue reading

#361 – FIVE WAYS TO KEEP YOUR AUDIENCE’S ATTENTION – FRED SCHENKELBERG

Featured

I have found the best way to lose an audience is to focus on statistical derivation. While this is a fascinating subject for me, it just doesn’t seem to hold an audience’s attention.

Having something interesting and useful to say is key to maintaining an audience’s attention, yet at times how we present helps them become distracted.

So, given great content or proposal, how can you help your audience not quickly check their phone, yet again? Continue reading